Sunday, 16 December 2012

The merits of beer ...

In Jared Brown's brief history of the cocktail in the Telegraph he reminds us thus:

William Hogarth etched “Gin Lane”, in 1751, portraying the deprivations of the inebriated poor. Though this would become an enduring propaganda piece for the temperance movement, it first appeared as one of a pair of etchings. “Gin Lane” demonstrated the destruction wrought upon society by mother's ruin. Its companion, “Beer Street”, illustrated a nation made healthy (morbid obesity was considered a sign of health) by beer.

The original caption for “Gin Lane” warned:
 
Gin, cursed Fiend, with Fury fraught,
Makes human Race a Prey.
It enters by a deadly Draught~
And steals our Life away.

Virtue and Truth, driv'n to Despair
Its Rage compells to fly,
But cherishes with hellish Care
Theft, Murder, Perjury.

Damned Cup! that on the Vitals preys
That liquid Fire contains,
Which Madness to the heart conveys,
And rolls it thro' the Veins.


 While the caption for “Beer Street” praised:
 
Beer, happy Produce of our Isle
Can sinewy Strength impart,
And wearied with Fatigue and Toil
Can cheer each manly Heart.

Labour and Art upheld by Thee
Successfully advance,
We quaff Thy balmy Juice with Glee
And Water leave to France.

Genius of Health, thy grateful Taste
Rivals the Cup of Jove,
And warms each English generous Breast
With Liberty and Love!
 Not a lot to add to that ... just about says it all

Friday, 14 December 2012

2013 The Year of the Pub

I've just about had a guts full of the procrastination of so called "industry leaders" and hereby declare ...


Friday, 7 December 2012

Why isn't the pub trade a career of choice?


Earlier this year, the pub trade press reported on research (by livebookings.com) that shows our much loved industry wouldn't be the choice of career for 43% of young people. A pretty depressing headline statistic, but as with all statistics, and journalism it's all about the spin. The headline could have run as something along the line of "Pub Trade still the career of choice for 57% of young people".

Of course this would be too simplistic, as one has no idea how many of those who didn't actively discount the idea of a career in hospitality would express a clear preference for a career in the industry. However, there must still be a fair proportion who would or might consider this career path. (I have asked them to share the full, non-commercially sensitive parts of their research, but to no avail at the time of writing). The important question for our industry is, how do we change many of the perceived attitudes to our industry - often reported as low paid, long hours, menial, boring and repetitive? These aren't just perceptions of those employed in the pub trade, but also those too readily expressed by its customers in their attitudes toward 'front-line' industry members in the form of abuse and insult that we've probably all experienced at some time in our careers.

For a long time the British Institute of Innkeeping has led the effort to present our industry as one of an exciting and professional sector, full of opportunity and personal development. The BII's much vaunted Apprenticeship Scheme is a prime example being trumpeted as a way of engaging young people in a professional career in the industry. Noble sentiments to be sure, but the reality for many in the industry, especially in "team member" roles (i.e. non-managerial) is more akin to the perceptions expressed in the research. Whilst the publicly quoted headline stats may only show part of the picture, one cannot help but think that perhaps we as an industry could do more to promote ourselves as a worthwhile career choice.

Over the years I have encountered many ill-informed and 'untrained' publicans whose idea of career development was little more than teaching a barperson how to pour a decent pint and bottle-up. Over that same period I have employed many who have only ever seen a job in a pub or kitchen as a filler in their desired career path and who have not wanted to progress.

Too often, in the relentless pursuit of profit, both companies and owner-operators neglect the need for meaningful, quality training both for the employees of the former and latterly for themselves. "Train To Gain" isn't just a mantra to increase profitability it's a sure fire formula to increase the professionalism, safety and standing of many team and management roles from the merely menial to that of professional competency.

Apart from getting the bare minimum under their belts, e,g, the training required to gain a Personal Licence, how many publicans (let alone their staff) also go on to undertake the training required under the law to run a lawful business? The BII make much of their Pre Entry Awareness Training (PEAT) for potential tenants and lessees but once this and licensing training has been completed the progression to other levels of competency are almost relegate to the status of "optional extras".

I've got a memorable new acronym for the industry, one that would benefit not only prospective tenants and lessees, but also freeholders, managers and all staff: 

P.E.R.T. Pre Entry Regulatory Training. 

(It's a bit sexier than compliance training eh?)

PERT would take both team members and managers through the four main areas required by legislation and regulations to run a safe and hygienic business. The four elements of PERT are: Emergency First Aid At Work, Manual Handling, Fire Marshall and at least Level 2 Food Safety.

I would venture to say that relatively few members of the industry have all four of these under their belt, yet they are all the basics required to run a hospitality business. Things have come a long way in another quasi-hospitality industry, that of commercial aviation, from where the cabin crew were perceived as mere "trolly dollies" to being a professional and rigorously trained team of air-borne servers, first aiders and safety officers. Perhaps it's time for the pub trade to 'reach for the skies' and elevate our bar-maids, cellar-boys and Al Murray stereotypes into professionally recognised and more importantly publicly recognised career professionals. Maybe then we can become more attractive to the next set of managers and entrepreneurs.

Customer service ... important now more than ever ...

See the latest market research into Customer Service shortfalls and their consequences on the Market Intelligence Report page ...

Finally an excuse for "binge drinking" ...

http://www.howtorunapub.co.ukAccording to Agence France ... 

"Consuming large quantities of a key ingredient in beer can protect against winter sniffles and even some serious illnesses in small children, a Japanese brewery said citing a scientific study.
A chemical compound in hops, the plant brewers use to give beer its bitter taste, provides an effective guard against a virus that can cause severe forms of pneumonia and bronchitis in youngsters, Sapporo Breweries said Wednesday.
In research with scientists at Sapporo Medical University, the compound — humulone — was found to be effective in curbing the respiratory syncytial (RS) virus, said the company, which funded the study.
"The RS virus can cause serious pneumonia and breathing difficulties for infants and toddlers, but no vaccination is available at the moment to contain it," said Jun Fuchimoto, a researcher from the company.
The virus tends to spread in winter and can also cause cold-like symptoms in adults.
Fuchimoto said such small quantities of humulone were present in beer that someone would have to drink around 30 cans, each of 350 millilitres (12 oz), for it to have any virus-fighting effect.
"We are now studying the feasibility of applying humulone to food or non-alcoholic products," he said. "The challenge really is that the bitter taste is going to be difficult for children."
The research also found that humulone alleviated inflammation caused by infection from the virus, the brewery said."
 Somehow I don't this will wash with the anti-alcohol brigade ...

Thursday, 6 December 2012

Smoke and Mirrors ... Solihull Style ...

http://www.howtorunapub.co.uk/bootcamps
Rob Wilcock, esteemed editor of the Publican's Morning Advertiser challenged Ted Tuppen to back up his comments that the average Enterprise tenant earns £45,000 a year ... you can see TT's analysis,  the PMA headline, summary and link below:

Enterprise Inns caused much derision and some cynical comments on the PMA’s online forum when it announced last month that the average Enterprise licensee achieves a profit of £45,000 a year (including a £10,000 estimate of the value of accommodation), while Enterprise gains an income of £67,000 and the Treasury takes a whopping £145,000"

As you say, Rob, the figures come from Enterprise. No doubt the methodology of extrapolating figures from their own shadow profit and loss model for prospective tenants and then claiming these as "average" across the estate may well come up with tenant profit at £45,000. As I have posted before using average is not generally very helpful, median or mode values are more meaningful in the real world.

You are also right to point out the trends ... but I have to seriously question whether increases in turnover can be attributed to pub disposals ... maybe on the capital investment front, although I should imagine a significant proportion of this would have been on remedial works to keep Enterprise's oft crumbling pubs open. More likely increased turnover is directly attributable to tenants having to increase prices to keep match with increased supply prices due to the increases in duty and VAT.

A more rigorous approach to comparative figures is to use the earlier figures as a base and to calculate the later figures net of inflationary pressures and then see if there have been changes to the tenant/landlord equation. Perhaps the £9,000 benefit to tenants in the last year is not quite as generous as it would seem.

One cannot dispute rent rolls as published in company accounts so I am gratified to see Enterprise adapting a more reasonable approach to rental values over the four years nor can one dispute the essential tenet of Tuppen's analysis that the Treasury is the biggest beneficiary from the average pub. However I think it is somewhat disingenuous of Tuppen to claim that his (and his company's) critics are either "ill-informed" who have neither the wit nor ability to apply "genuine analytical rigour" to the "self-interested nonsene spouted by a handful of campaigners". Would these "unprofessional" campaigners include highly respected and successful figures in the industry and the entire BISC? Probably.

But my most serious opprobrium has to be for Tuppen's bare-faced cheek in claiming to be the model of virtue by jumping on the "responsible UK-based tax paying company" bandwagon... like his tenants aren't!

If the evidence to BISC that 67% of tied tenants earn less than £15,000 is taken as true and by using Ted's reckonings, then none of them can be Enterprise tenants and must all be tenants of the other pubcos and brewers.

My verdict in this "trial by hearsay and innuendo" ? That Tuppen made some inadvisable comments and his management team, knowing perhaps a little more about life in the real world of the Enterprise estate, advised him to do some back-tracking and the best way is to wrap it all up in estimates and more importantly distract our attention from the inequality of divisible profit by some crafty legerdemain and putting all the blame on the Treasury.

Nice try Ted ...

Monday, 3 December 2012

Taste of the Nation ...

Deloitte's excellent Taste of the Nation six-monthly snapshot of 3,000 UK consumers is out ... to save you wading through it all, I've done 3 precis for you on the Market Intelligence Report page ...

Friday, 30 November 2012

Machine Game Duty

Don't forget you only have until 11/1/13 to register for Machine Game Duty ... "what the hell is that?" certainly seems to be the most commons response as it is reported in the Publicans' Morning Advertiser that 99% of premises with games machines have yet to register.



Click on me to find out more ...

Thursday, 29 November 2012

Nostradamus ... or ... Cassandra ?



Around this time of year the media is full of various predictions of what will be "big" in the hospitality industry. To save you time I have trawled through over 30 different reports and noted what seems to be the most agreed upon trends we in the pub trade should be paying attention to … so check the latest Market Intelligence Reports page ...

Wednesday, 28 November 2012

Advice to customers ...

Just for a little bit of fun, in these times of austerity, minimum pricing, beer duty escalators etc ... hopefully it will remind us of why we are in the pub trade ... banter and a sense of humour ... if you want to read a fantastically evocative eligy to the great British pub then head over to Tandleman's blog (who by the way has just celebrated his 1,000th post ... congratulations) ... Tandleman captures, perfectly, the quiet joy of pub life.

Cobbled together from various sources ...

Friday, 23 November 2012

Wednesday, 21 November 2012

Lies, damned lies ... and well, just lies ...

As all you men out there will know it's a statistically proven fact that ManFlu is 20 times worse than WomanFlu (there are statistics to prove it here at Nursing Voices a global nursing forum) ... a fact to which I can currently attest as I shiver and shake on the verge of death ... so you'll excuse me if I'm brief about my disdain and disbelief about the raft of "statistical information" currently being bandied about by the neo-prohibitionists at Alcohol Concern and their myriad ranks of supporters in the 'health industry'.

For a long time now I and others have been high-lighting the inconsistencies in the arguments of the anti-drink lobby but this years Alcohol Awareness Week brings a truly unbelievable slew of 'facts' and figures to support their hysteria.

So if you want to see some of the counter-arguments then I suggest you head over to Pete Brown's Beer Blog and Phil Mellow's Politics of Drinking for some considered analysis of Alcohol Concern's outrageous calumnies.

If you search this blog for my musings on this subject you will see that Alcohol Concern is not alone in its distortion of the truth ...use the search button and look for alcohol concern ...

As for me? Well it may be relatively early in the day to imbibe, but I am going to supplement my Carlsberg Beecham's Cold  & Flu powder with a hefty shot of whisky and retire to my death-bed. If by some miracle I survive my bout of ManFlu I shall resume normal service shortly ... if not, send lilies.

For more factual information about ManFlu check out this highly respected health information site.

Saturday, 17 November 2012

How To Be A Tax Avoider...or how I learned to love Amazon, Starbucks, et al ...



Recently I ran a call to action to answer the Treasury's rejection of any review of the beer duty escalator under the image of a ballot box with the tagline "If you can't join them …"

Today, I think I will revert to the more traditional "If you can't beat them, join them…"

Accordingly, I am pleased to announce the formation of The Perfect Pint Company ™. As you will see from the articles of incorporation (to follow shortly) The Perfect Pint Company ™ is based in Luxembourg, where it's highly dedicated staff (of one … me) will provide every independent pub operator in the country with a unique franchise offering.

The franchise will consist of a single piece of intellectual property, to wit, the way to pour and serve the perfect pint (pictured right). In return for the modest fee of 100% of all your takings The Perfect Pint Company ™ will provide you with a handy, easy to use portable diagram and instructions on how to serve and pour the perfect pint and more importantly will undertake to "fulfil" all your customer orders. You will only "deliver the product" to your customers.

Having received your total income, we will provide the invaluable service and management advice contained in The Perfect Pint Company ™ instruction card at the very reasonable cost to The Perfect Pint Company ™ of 99% of your turnover to cover the "cost of product sales and other ongoing costs related to the operations of the company".

The Perfect Pint Company ™ will then pay tax on the 1% of your turnover to the Luxembourg government. By means of a reciprocal licensing fee The Perfect Pint Company ™ will remit to you all monies required to operate your business and fulfil your VAT and PAYE liabilities. The Perfect Pint Company ™ will pay the shareholders of The Perfect Pint Company ™ a dividend on which 10% income tax can be levied in the UK. (You should note that dividends under £35,000 are eligible for a 10% tax credit … so you'll in effect not pay any tax on this income).

The shareholders of The Perfect Pint Company ™ will, of course, be you the franchisees. As your UK based "economic activity" units (your pubs) will be making an operating loss, your UK based pub business will not be subject to corporation tax so you can quite legitimately trouser the difference.

Application forms for potential franchisees can be obtained from The Perfect Pint Company ™ SARL, 13 Rue de la Boucherie, 1066, Luxembourg. Alternatively if you are visiting Luxembourg, call in and collect your franchise pack in person … just knock on the door and say "The one-breasted coffee vendor sent me …" 

(p.s. Brewers will be able to buy their hops from our Swiss domiciled subsidiary at a very reasonable 200% mark-up ...)

Tuesday, 13 November 2012

Market Intelligence Reports

Some of you will know that I have recently discovered "infographics" and used them in the spirit of " a picture paints a thousand words" ... I've now added a new page to store those (and other reports) that I think may be of interest to those running pubs ... hope you find them useful.

You say tomatoes, I say tomatoes ...

OK ... so I said I wouldn't be doing too many picture posts ... but in light of the Public Accounts Committee grilling of tax-avoiding companies Starbucks, Amazon and Google yesterday ...

Please feel free to use it as you will ...

In the interest of fairness, however, I would point out that Margaret Hodge (Chair of the Committee) must have some major "cojones" if this Telegraph story is to be believed

All you publicans and brewers out there must be wondering WTF is going on in this country when HMRC and HMG are intent on going after the little guy (and gal) when the big boys are getting away with such blatant and immoral tax evasion avoidance ... the "come the revolution" line is growing by the day and must now include not only bankers, but also their 'partners in crime' in the big accountancy firms. Don't you just love the new HMRC adverts?

But closing in on whom?



With reports that the Treasury is facing a £48 billion "black hole" in its books that will require another £22 billion of tax increases or spending cuts in the next spending round, surely it's time HMG sorted this mess out and we had an equitable tax regime where all individuals and businesses paid a "just amount" of tax and contribute proportionally to the societies where their economic activity occurs (pubs and brewers paid a combined £11 billions in duty, tax, VAT, national insurance last year alone) and more importantly inculcate a moral climate where it is seen as the right thing to do to pay one's way and not a jolly wheeze to think of ever more intricate ways to cheat the public purse of one's fair share. Perhaps, and only then, will we feel "we're all in this together".

Monday, 12 November 2012

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

You decide ...
Well this is probably a first, me using my almost long-forgotten schoolboy Latin. So, far from being of no use as I would continually harangue Mr Moore (my Latin master), it has come in handy this week. In essence, and at the risk of being corrected by pedants and Latin scholars, "who will watch the watchmen?".

Essentially the current administration of Eton educated Latin scholars has asked this question and come to the conclusion that we, the plebian proletariat, should decide who should watch the watchmen, which is why we are all expected to troop off to the polling station this Thursday (November 15th) to cast our ballots to elect our own Police and Crime Commissioners (PCC)... 37 of them across England and 4 in Wales.

Some may say that this will make the police more accountable and will further democratise one of our public services, namely the police, as unelected Police Authorities will be replaced by a PCC, Others will argue that we run the risk of further politicising the police and their activities and replace a committee of well informed, well intentioned Police Authority members with great experience and breadth of knowledge of crime and how it affects our respective areas with a PCC who doesn't have to have any experience of policing as a prerequisite of candidacy. Whichever view you subscribe to, these elections are upon us and it behoves us in the pub trade to find out who our local candidates are, what they are promising in their election manifestos and consider what will happen to local policing under their authority. 

The government assures us PCCs will have no operational control of our police forces especially in terms of where the diminishing resource of front-line officers will be deployed and what the priorities of those officers will be in the execution of their duties. My fear, and this is a fear shared by many discussing this issue in the media, is that they will; if not by the very dint of being able to hire and fire Chief Constables and oversee police budgets. One can easily imagine a PCC suggesting a Chief Constable immediately puts resources to a perceived problem that the PCC has become exercised about and the Chief Constable resisting this instruction. Result? The PCC sacks the Chief Constable and replaces that officer with one that will do their bidding. Far-fetched? Not really, the Mayor of London has for many years been London's PCC and the current incumbent has already sacked one Metropolitan Police Commissioner... Sir Ian Blair

If you recall Sir Ian's three and a half years in post were plagued by questions about his judgement, leadership credentials and 'politically correct' style of policing. His last months in office were bogged down in unprecedented controversy and in-fighting after he was accused of racism by a series of ethnic minority officers, including the country's top Asian policeman Tarique Ghaffur. It resulted in the upper ranks of the Met being plunged into a virtual state of paralysis, with officers regarding Sir Ian as a lame duck chief no longer in charge of his force. He was forced to eventually resign after a bitter (and very public) showdown with the Tory Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, who said he had no confidence in him, the first time in modern history a Met Commissioner has been as good as sacked.

Is this a scenario we want played out across the country? Well, in some respects, it's too late, the change is upon us, but there is still just a little time to influence the choice of whom we are all going to get. So find out what your local candidate is proposing, think about how it's going to affect your business and your customers and above all make sure you vote. Despite the old anarchist graffito of "It doesn't matter who you vote for, they always get in" ... it does matter and if you get an anti-pub commissioner elected in your area you'll soon know about it. You think late night levies will remain the province of city and town centre pubs only? You think that pub closure orders by the police won't be used by hysterical PCCs in response to health lobbyists and neoprohibitionists? You think that scarce resources won't be deployed only in areas where the most votes for the PCC were cast (or come re-election time might be cast)?

We get precious few opportunities to exercise our democratic right in this country and it would be a shame to squander this one ... if nothing else it'll get you out of the pub for half an hour and who knows you might get a PCC that understands the invaluable role that pubs play in the social cohesion of the communities that both they and the police serve.